Saturday, October 3, 2015

How to Read a Financial Statement

Given all the information, rumors, and opinions floating around about the current state of the Watchtower’s finances, I thought it might be useful to discuss financial reporting practices and methods. For those that don’t know, I’m a retired accountant with about thirty years of experience, mostly in real estate investment. My experience is in the United States, I based this article on US accounting practices.

To properly understand the financial state of any company, you need at least four reports: the Balance Sheet, Statement of Income and Expense, Statement of Changes in Financial Position (also called Sources and Uses of Cash) and the footnotes. In dealing with an organization as big as the Watchtower, you also need “consolidated statements” that total the results for all subsidiary companies. The Watchtower may not produce one, nor is public disclosure of any financial information required. In other words, we may never fully know the Watchtower’s financial state.

After verifying compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Practices (GAAP), and the accuracy of the information, and independent accounting firm will attach a statement judging the accuracy of the financials. There are two critical factors in this statement. First, if the auditor says he has reservations about the information, be careful. Secondly, look to see who the auditor is, if it’s the CEO’s brother-in-law, take it with a grain of salt.

The Balance Sheet is a snapshot of the company’s financial position at a particular time i.e. “December 31, 2014.” It takes its name from the fundamental accounting equation Assets = Liabilities + Owner’s Equity.  The two sides must be equal, or balance. A balance sheet that is not in balance is wrong. Without a correct balance sheet, it is impossible to know if the income statement is accurate.

The balance sheet provides an important look at a company’s financial health. If liabilities exceed assets, the company may be in trouble. If current liabilities (bills due now) exceed current assets (cash in the bank) it may have a short-term problem, even if overall health is good.

The Statement of Income and Expense is straightforward, it shows revenues and expenses; for a period of time, and the resulting profit or loss. Again some of analysis is needed. What is the source of revenue? How has profitability changed over time? This would, for example, highlight the Watchtower’s revenue problem following the changes in collecting money from literature sales. What are expenses? Where is the money going?  

The Statement of Changes provides related and critical information. This statement will reveal, for example, sales of assets to maintain cash flow.

Proper understanding of the financial statements depends on the footnotes. Accountants will want to know such matters as cash vs accrual accounting, depreciation methods, changes in accounting methods, and one time recognition of extraordinary losses (such as lawsuits). Without this information, we cannot understand the financial reports.

For example, the WTBS may take a onetime charge on its income statement to cover future losses from lawsuits. This information will appear in footnotes. Or the legal department may note the suits are frivolous and without merit, and no contingent liability exists; in their opinion.  This sort of information tells us a lot about the financial management of a company.

As I mentioned, consolidated statements are important, as they present a complete financial picture, adding the assets, liabilities and profits of all subisiaries. It is very possible, in fact probable, that some parts of the WTBS are losing money, while other parts are making money. We won’t know this without full financial disclosure. 
If anybody has specific questions, fire away.  I will answer any I can.    

Sunday, May 10, 2015

The Governing Body Saws Off the Branch It's Sitting On

Today’s (May 10, 2015) Watchtower study contains a remarkable shift in the organizations method of Bible interpretation.

When I became a Witness they commonly used a method of interpretation called “type-antitype.”  Under this method of interpretation, Bible events, the type; foreshadow future events, the antitype.  For example, Jonah’s three days in the whale prefigured Jesus’ three days in the grave. During my years as a Witness it seemed that everything in the Bible was a preview of later events. Most of the time, the Watchtower said that ancient events prefigured the Watchtower.

The most notable example appeared in the March 1, 1981 Watchtower, which said that the following list of Biblical events prefigured the Jehovah’s Witnesses:
(1) Noah's wife, Gen. 7:7; (2) angels sent to Lot,
Gen. 19:15; (3) Rebekah, Gen. 24:64; (4) Joseph and Benjamin, Gen. 45:14; (5) gleanings left behind, Lev. 19:9; (6) two spies to Rahab, Josh. 2:4; (7) Barak, Judg. 4:14; (8) Jephthah, Judg. 11:34; (9) Naomi and Ruth, Ruth 2:2; (10) David's Israelite warriors, 2 Sam. 18:1; (11) Jehu, 2 Ki. 10:11, 15; (12) Mordecai and Esther, Esther 4:13; (13) Job, Job 42:10, 13; (14) King's daughter, Ps. 45:13; (15) men of loving-kindness, Ps. 50:5; (16) intimate group, Ps. 89:7; (17) Shear-jashub, Isa. 7:3; (18) light of the nations, Isa.60:3;  (19) big trees of righteousness, Isa. 61:3; (20) ministers of our God, Isa. 61:6; (21) cluster preserved, Isa. 65:8; (22) servants called by another name, Isa. 65:15; (23) men trembling at God's word, Isa. 66:5; (24) new nation born, Isa.66:8; (25) Jeremiah, Jer. 1:10; (26) Jehovah's people in the new covenant, Jer. 31:33; (27) enduring watchman, Ezek. 3:16-27; (28) man in linen, Ezek. 9:2; (29) cleansed people, Ezek. 36:29-32; (30) dwellers in center of earth, Ezek. 38:12; (31) the host of heaven, Dan. 8:10; (32) sanctuary restored (cleansed), Dan. 8:14; (33) they that are wise, Dan. 11:33; (34) the happy one who is keeping in expectation, Dan. 12:12; (35) all flesh receiving the spirit, Joel 2:28; (36) Jonah, Jon. 3:1-3; (37) apple of Jehovah's eye, Zech. 2:8; (38) liberated remnant, Zech. 2:7; (39) a Jew, Zech. 8:23; (40) sons of Levi, Mal. 3:3; (41) wheat, Matt. 13:25; (42) sons of the kingdom, Matt. 13:38; (43) workers for the vineyard, Matt. 20:1; (44) those invited to marriage feast, Matt. 22:3-14; (45) chosen ones, Matt. 24:22; (46) eagles, Matt. 24:28; (47) faithful and discreet slave, Matt. 24:45; (48) discreet virgins, Matt. 25:2; (49) brothers of the king, Matt. 25:40; (50) little flock of sheep, Luke 12:32; (51) beggar Lazarus, Luke 16:20; (52) sheep in "this fold," John 10:1-16; (53) branches of the vine, John 15:4; (54) royal palace of David, Acts 15:16; (55) heirs with Christ, Rom. 8:17; (56) the remnant, Rom. 11:5; (57) branches in the olive tree, Rom. 11:24; (58) holy ones or saints, 1 Cor. 6:2; Rev. 16:6; (59) temple, 1 Cor. 6:19; (60) new creation, 2 Cor. 5:17; (61) ambassadors for Christ, 2 Cor. 5:20; (62) congregation of God, Gal. 1:13; (63) part of Abraham's seed, Gal. 3:29; (64) Israel of God, Gal. 6:16; (65) body of Christ, Eph. 1:22, 23; (66) soldiers of Christ Jesus, 2 Tim. 2:3; (67) house under Christ, Heb. 3:6; (68) holy priesthood, 1 Pet. 2:5; (69) holy nation, 1 Pet. 2:9; (70) association of brothers, 1 Pet. 2:17; (71) seven congregations, Rev. 1:20; (72) twenty-four persons of advanced age, Rev. 4:4; (73) spiritual Israel, Rev. 7:4; (74) locusts, Rev. 9:3; (75) two witnesses, Rev. 11:3; (76) two olive trees, Rev. 11:4; (77) seed of the woman, Rev. 12:17; (78) New Jerusalem, Rev. 21:2; (79) the bride of Christ, Rev. 22:17; 19:7; (80) Jehovah's witnesses, Isa. 43:10.
This list of types and antitypes were said to be the “credentials” establishing the fact that the Watchtower Society speaks for God.

The problem: today’s Watchtower study generally abandons the type/antitype interpretation. 
“10 As we might expect, over the years Jehovah has helped “the faithful and discreet slave” to become steadily more discreet. Discretion has led to greater caution when it comes to calling a Bible account a prophetic drama unless there is a clear Scriptural basis for doing so. Additionally, it has been found that some of the older explanations about types and antitypes are unduly difficult for many to grasp. The details of such teachings—who pictures whom and why—can be hard to keep straight, to remember, and to apply. Of even greater concern, though, is that the moral and practical lessons of the Bible accounts under examination may be obscured or lost in all the scrutiny of possible antitypical fulfillments. Thus, we find that our literature today focuses more on the simple, practical lessons about faith, endurance, godly devotion, and other vital qualities that we learn about from Bible accounts.

Two paragraphs later it adds “12 Should we conclude that Bible narratives have only a practical application and no other meaning? No. Today our publications are more likely to teach that one thing 

reminds us of or serves to illustrate another. They are less likely to present many Bible accounts in a 

rigidframework of prophetic types and anti-types.

If a “rigid system” of types and antitypes exists, the above list of credentials is invalid. Today’s study is the functional equivalent of saying “all those diplomas and awards listed on my resume are fakes.”  

Since the Watchtower has abandoned its own “credentials” why should anyone listen to them?